Posted 7 hours ago

evilfeminist:

 I’m a huge supporter of things which annoy misogynistic rich white men

Posted 8 hours ago
Posted 8 hours ago
Potter has done too much for me for me to ever want to shit all over it. I’m never going to say: ‘Don’t ask me questions about that’. I remember reading an interview with Robert Smith from The Cure. Somebody said to him: ‘Why do you still wear all that makeup, don’t you feel a bit past it?’ And he said: ‘There are still 14-year-olds coming to see The Cure for the first time, dressed like that. I’d never want to make them feel silly.’ It’s a similar thing with Potter. People are still discovering those books and films. It would be awful for them to find out the people involved had turned their backs on it. Though sometimes, people do come up and say ‘I loved you in The Woman in Black,’ which is really sweet. That’s them knowing that it matters to me that I’ve done other stuff.

Daniel Radcliffe for London Magazine (x)

(via j-anetsnakehole)

Daniel Radcliffe turned out to be the best celebrity I’ve ever seen. And it’s in the small ways, like this one.

(via whitebeltwriter)

(Source: potterbird)

Posted 8 hours ago

precumming:

ITS SO UNFAIR WHEN YOU LOVE SINGING BUT YOU WERENT BORN WITH A GOOD VOICE

Posted 13 hours ago

unfrickable:

do not sexualize young girls.
yes, I am kink shaming you. 
because you should be ashamed of yourself
for sexualizing young girls, and
no one’s sexual liberation is more important
than protecting young girls.

Posted 13 hours ago

whitegirlsaintshit:

nedahoyin:

toneyspeaksloud:

Nicki Minaj shining a light on the differences on acceptable sexuality from white women and black women.

While it has a good deal to do with color, it also has to do with the fact of how her sexuality is used.

The women above her could arguably be said to be catering to the sexual needs/wants/fantasies of men (Sports Illustrated is ESPECIALLY known for catering to a male gaze.)  While Nicki Minaj has continuously used her sexuality to empower herself.  Her sexuality isn’t for men, it’s for her own self.  And THAT is a huge problem.  Sexuality that isn’t designed for male consumption is deemed unacceptable and threatening.  She is powerful, demanding, uncompromising, and men are weak, so that scares them.

And it’s also because she’s of Indian/Black background, no doubt about it.  It’s not just racist, it’s also sexist.

#reblog again

*Lemongrab voice* UNACCEPTABLE

(Source: 20daysofjune)

Posted 13 hours ago

http://madamethursday.tumblr.com/post/93149178937/its-really-sad-when-part-of-me-praising-a-tv-show

madamethursday:

It’s really sad when part of me praising a TV show is, “ZOMG, there was this part where the female protagonist told her male love interest to go away and never talk to her again because he did something hurtful to her and he said he understands, he’s sorry for it, it was wrong, and then he…

Posted 14 hours ago

Being in an industry that is so male focused have you ever experienced any struggles with sexism in forms of interviews? And if you have, how have you adjusted to that? (x)

(Source: evilbrochu)

Posted 14 hours ago

nedafeedinghope:

Great example of savvy media literacy!

(Source: fatgirlinohio)

Posted 14 hours ago

pardonmewhileipanic:

hellyesimthatgirl:

fandomsandfeminism:

yoshi-bomb:

#feminist #feminism #women

I’m always amused when women, especially white, cis, straight women, take on this “well, I don’t see how Feminism benefits ME, so fuck it!” mentality. 

Because, like, ok, perhaps you have enough privileges that the impact of systematic gender inequality is pretty mitigated for you. Sure. 

But, like, do you not give a shit about your sisters? About your sisters of color, and LGBTQIAP+ sisters, and disabled sisters? About your sisters who ARE targets of violence, who are suffering? 

Because lists like this only betray 2 things, a) That the person who wrote it does not understand the sociological concepts and theories that lay the foundation for much of feminist theory and b) that they don’t give a shit about anyone less fortunate than themselves in regards to marginalization and oppression. 

OP is on some ignorant shit.

how to completely misunderstand and misrepresent feminism, while showing arrogance, ignorance, and complete disdain for those who are suffering: a photo post by someone with no concept of oppression

Also, if you think the patriarchy doesn’t affect you, and that you aren’t a target for violence, be it general or sexual, you might want to sit down, because I have some seriously bad news for you

(Source: that-damn-water-temple)